I recently got into a lively “Tweet Off” with author Jackson Pearce about, of all things, the $45 million payout Conan O’Brien is receiving in order to exit The Tonight Show. The debate didn’t center around the recently ended late night war between Conan and Leno. To be honest, I could care less about that. I prefer Letterman. Even then, I don’t watch late night television all that often.
Anyway…
Prior to finding out that Conan’s final stunts didn’t cost as much as he purported (by his own admission), I was indignant. Given the tragedy that had recently befallen Haiti and the ongoing problems in the world, it seemed to me, foolish and wrong to be spending a great deal of money on a flashy car to dress up like a giant rodent and a mink Snuggie for a horse. Whatever humorous point Conan was trying to make was drowned out by the staggering cares of the world. Then, he admitted that the stunts were fake and nowhere near as costly as he was making them out to be. He even poked fun at angry bloggers hitting their keyboards to write “Dear Internet” letters about just how angry they were. Of course, I had just released a slew of Tweets into the Twitterverse to that effect, so I felt a bit sheepish. Still…something didn’t quite sit right with me.
Forty-five million dollars is a bit excessive. Okay, well, it’s a lot excessive. When the President of the United States takes the time to sit down and write an article for Newsweek about “Why Haiti Matters,” hearing about some dude getting paid an ungodly amount of cash to exit a talk show seems like a lesson in misplaced priorities. Add to that the fact that the recent “Hope for Haiti Now” benefit (advertised heavily during Conan’s final telecast) raised 58 million dollars and it makes it seem downright sinful. NBC paid Conan O’Brien 45 million dollars. More than 33 million of that will go directly to O’Brien and the remaining 12 million will go to his staff. For those of you keeping score, that’s almost 60 thousand dollars a staffer. Take into consideration the seven months worked and that adds up to nearly nine thousand dollars a month per staff member. All total, the money paid to O’Brien and his 200 staffers is almost 78% of what was raised to help with the relief efforts for millions of suffering people. Let me put this into perspective for you, NBC paid 201 people 45 million dollars to leave a television program while others around the world pooled their resources in the midst of “the worst recession since the Great Depression” to raise money to help the poor and disenfranchised.
Ms. Pearce took issue with the judgmental tone my tweets took. “Aren’t you supposed to judge not?” was the initial question posed to me. From here, it spiraled into questions of excess versus poverty, luxury versus contentment, the nature of hypocrisy, and relative wealth. This is not the first time I have been called judgmental. And, to be honest, sometimes I have been pharisaical in how I go about dispensing grace (as if it were mine to dispense). That cannot be denied. My human frailty often puts me on the wrong side of judgment. So, I would like to thank Ms. Pearce for the reminder that I am an agent of grace, not condemnation.
Be that as it may, there is something troubling about the world we find ourselves in as Christians when it comes to the practice of judgment. Ms. Pearce’s response and many others like hers beg the question: Are Christians called to judge? What does it mean to judge? If I look at the situation and say, “That’s wrong on a fundamental level,” is that judgment, or it is something else?
Jesus says, “Judge not, that you be not judged. For with the judgment you pronounce you will be judged, and with the measure you use it will be measured to you.” (Matthew 7:1-2, ESV) This is the verse that is often alluded to in order to bolster the argument for Christians not standing in a place of judgment over others. And rightly so. This is a great warning against Christians pronouncing other people guilty before God. Approaching other people’s lives and actions with a judgmental and harsh attitude results in God judging us in the same manner. But, it is not a proscription against judging altogether. Quite the contrary. Matthew 7:1-2 is the opening of Christ’s statements of how Christians are called to judge rightly.
The verse continues forward, “Why do you see the speck that is in brother’s eye, but do not notice the log that is in your own eye? You hypocrite, take the log out of your own eye, and then you will see clearly to take the speck out of your brother’s eye.” Here, we find Jesus using hyperbole to get across a point about self-evaluation before evaluation of others. He doesn’t say, “Just judge yourself. Leave others be.” He says, “Judge yourself first that you may be in a better position to help another see where they might do better.”
But, “judgment” today is a far cry from what Christ was getting at. Better stated, any form of judgment—even necessary and good judgment—is viewed as unnecessary and harsh. Today’s culture operates with the unstated maxim that “fences make good neighbors/mind your own business.” We enjoy our autonomy, our vote, and our rightness in every decision we make. But, some decisions are wrong. Some priorities are misplaced.
When a multinational corporation like NBC pays out huge sums of money to a few people while simultaneously begging the world population (i.e. Americans) to “do their part” and give to the “Hope for Haiti” Benefit Fund, I grow a bit concerned that we have somehow missed the plot. When that same multinational corporation—owned by the elite few—is responsible for “developing” third world countries under the guise of “long term economic growth/investment” while simultaneously moving the urban poor further to the fringes, I grow a bit concerned. When multinational corporations cause conditions on a daily basis and then avoid filming it for fear of public outcry, I grow a bit concerned. Haiti has only been filmed and photographed and written about and blogged about because, currently, it is unavoidable. But, even now, the footage of Haiti is beginning to fade…
Last night, I live Tweeted the season premiere of LOST. A few days before that, it was the GRAMMYs. So, while I write this to you, please understand that I write with a preacher’s heart to myself. I have missed the plot. I miss the plot every single day in some way shape or form. As I use my laptop to write this treatise, am I inadvertently supporting some conglomerate that causes the very problems I am shaking my fist at? As I attempt to “judge rightly,” do I really care?
So, yes, I am being judgmental. I do not fear being judgmental. But, in the process, I am indicting myself for my own lethargy in regards to the matter in hopes of shaking myself from slumber along with the sleeping giant. I want to remove the speck and the log. It is right for me to judge that “NBC does not really care about Haiti. They can do better.” It is even more right for me to judge that “I do not really care about Haiti. I can do better.”
So can you.
This blog entry was written exclusively for TheChristianManifesto.com. Please do not post elsewhere on the internet or quote extensively without prior written consent from TheChristianManifesto.com. Views expressed here do not necessarily reflect the views and positions of The Christian Manifesto. All views expressed are solely those of the blogger.





I like the point that after we remove the log from our own eyes, we are supposed to help our brother with the speck in his eye. Like many others, I tend to skip over that part of the passage and focus on the log, forgetting the speck all together. I like the fresh perspective.
Nicely done, Calvin. I saw the Twitter back and forth and was getting frustrated because I understood where you were coming from. It’s hard to communicate in tiny little posts. I think you did a great job in this post, though. Judgment has turned into a bad word, and it shouldn’t be. But it’s difficult to maintain the proper balance that you talk about here. Great job, man.
Yeah, I agree with you man. Pointing out the fact that you could care more about haiti too adds a ton of validity to your argument. (Which is one reason you did it of course) But really well done man.
no matter what happens, the world keeps spinning. movie stars get paid enormous sums of money, big businesses get bigger, bill gates continues to be bill gates. I don’t even know what to judge here. What’s the issue with Conan getting bought out of his contract at 45 million dollars? How in the world is this remotely related to Haiti? In the television and movie industry, talent gets paid a lot of money to do what they do, and Conan made out like a bandit when his network tried to do him dirty. Listen, next to Haiti, everything is trivial. A man making 45 million bucks for making jokes and interviewing celebs, the golden globes, the grammys, the production costs for each episode of 24, Lost, Heroes or any other network TV show…and let’s not even get started on how much it makes to make a movie (Avatar, anyone?)
The thing is, it’s not NBC’s responsibility to stop doing business and save the world. No Hollywood entity holds that responsibility. When crisis happens, it is up to each individual to decide how they will respond and assist. Conan chose to use some of final moments to encourage donating towards the cause. Other celebs chose to hold a telethon. Others probably quietly and anonymously gave donations.
Is Conan O’Brien a bad person for receiving 45 million dollars simply because there’s horrible things happening in the world? I mean, of course it’s excessive. No big name celebs isn’t paid EXCESSIVELY but that’s business and there’s nothing wrong with that. Sure, I hope he is generous in his money, especially in a time when so many are in need. But that’s not really our business.
I’m not going to ponder every celeb’s salary, analyze every multi-million dollar deal, and get worked up over the fact that said money could be used for something more useful. That’s their business. My business is figuring out what I can do to help and trying to rally others together to spread compassion and grace to those in need.
Conan can take his 45 million dollars and do what he wants. Hopefully he does some good with it. You may not like that NBC is paying out that much money, but it’s not really our business. They were at least kind enough to sacrifice ad revenues and air the Hope for Haiti telethon commercial free. For an industry that is all about making every cent you can, that’s admirable.
We can’t cry foul when every news outlet doesn’t keep Haiti as the front page story. It’s not their job to promote humanitarian causes–they are their to get ratings as they report the news. It is up to each individual (especially Christians) to reach the broken even when they aren’t front page news. Everything else really doesn’t matter. There’s nothing to judge. There’s nothing to talk about. Let’s just all do as much as we can to help an awful situation and not worry so much about what NBC or anyone else is doing.
Josh,
I’m not sure saying, “No big name celebs isn’t paid EXCESSIVELY but that’s business and there’s nothing wrong with that,” makes your statement true. There IS something wrong with excessive amounts of money being poured into what entertains us while turning a blind eye to the things that ail us. There is something even more wrong with the latent hypocrisy of my decrying it as that is what I tend to focus on myself. You’re right, though. It is not the job of NBC to stop doing business to save the world. My point was that we shouldn’t consider conglomerates that help create the very problems we all avoid looking at as altruistic when they turn their cameras on something that is unavoidable. NBC looked at Haiti because it HAD to. But, the moment it didn’t have to, it stopped.
My point is that we could ALL care about Haiti more. We could ALL care about our neighbor more. We could ALL care about the least of these more. If that means we entertain ourselves less and decide to pay an educator more than we pay an NBA basketball player on an actor in a film or television show, then so be it. I can live with that.
Most importantly, I tried my hardest in this piece to show that casting judgment on Conan O’Brien is not the purpose. The purpose is to examine my own heart and actions before I look at Conan O’Brien, NBC, or anyone who could be doing better with what they have. If I don’t examine my own motives while simultaneously decrying people who will never respond to my blog entry, what good is that?